These 'Impossible' Fossils are Casting Doubt on Evolutionary Theories

Michael Ashcraft, Mark Ellis : Jan 12, 2016
God Reports

"These amazing fossilized imprints/remains have left the scientific community scratching their heads," -Mihai Andrei

A handprint, a finger, a footprint and a hammer are part of a growing number of "impossible fossils"—so called because they upend the evolutionary timetable and puncture the theory of evolution. (Photo via God Reports)

A handprint in limestone from the Cretaceous Era—110 million years ago—was found near Weatherford, Texas, in the 1970s. It is on display at the Creation Evidence Museum in Glen Rose, Texas.

Either human-like creatures were on earth much earlier than thought, or the dating methods are flawed and the earth is much younger than most scientists will admit.

A fossilized human finger also from the Cretaceous Era was found also in the 1970s in the Commanche Peak Limestone formation in Texas and is on display at the Creation Evidence Museum. The fact that flesh has been fossilized (normally only bones make it through millennia as fossils) could result from instant entombment in mud (from a huge flood, for example).

Staunch evolutionists have worked vigorously to poke holes in the credibility of these discoveries—with good reason, because they poke holes in the theory of evolution. The extent to which they defend a pet theory in spite of discrediting discoveries reveals a lack of scientific integrity, many believe.

"These amazing fossilized imprints/remains have left the scientific community scratching their heads," said Mihai Andrei on ZME Science, himself no creationist.

Another footprint—called the Alvis Delk Cretaceous Footprint—is even more intriguing because it is intersected by the footprint of an Acrocanthosaurus dinosaur print. This suggests that dinosaurs and man walked the Earth at the same time. The infrequency of such intersections in fossils makes sense: humans tried to stay away from the fearsome animals.

"Human footprints in geologically ancient strata would indeed call into doubt many conventional geological...

Continue reading here.