|
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Make-or-Break Decision Coming: President Trump's Tariffs on TrialIf the president doesn't have freedom to respond to the big picture—and to draw it—then no part of government, not Congress and certainly not the judiciary, will have the capacity to act on the scale needed to give our nation a unified direction in global contests.
[PJMedia.com] In times of national emergency, should the Supreme Court dictate America's grand strategy and international economic policies? This question confronts the justices this week inLearning Resources v. Trump, a case that puts the president's tariff powers to the test. If President Donald Trump loses, the Treasury faces having to refund more than $100 billion in tariff revenue, and the president's trade strategy will be thrown into chaos. Businesses that have already changed their operations because of the tariffs, drawing jobs and supply chains back to America, will be subject to grave new uncertainties: Will Trump find other legal grounds for his tariffs or will his project collapse, throwing the country back to an era of unfettered globalization? The law Trump relies on most for his tariffs is the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEP, which gives him broad powers to "regulate" international trade when the president declares an emergency. Trump has declared both the trade deficit and the fentanyl crisis to be emergencies under IEEP. But critics argue the legislation doesn't authorize tariffs—tariffs are taxes, they say, and the Constitution only gives Congress power to tax. Yet obviously it's the president who collects taxes, and by giving the president emergency economic powers to deal with international problems, Congress may logically have given the president power to collect tariffs at whatever rate he deems necessary. The law allows the president to go so far as to suspend trade with a foreign country and impose crippling economic sanctions at his discretion. If a president can do that much under IEEP, he must be able to take the less drastic step of regulating trade through penalties—tariffs—on foreign producers.
We've had trade deficits since about 1970, consistently; what makes today's any different? What's changed is they've reached critical mass, not only in Trump's determination but in the opinion of the American public, which elected the "tariff man" last year knowing exactly what he planned to do about industrial decline. The IEEP lets the president—not the courts—make the call about emergencies emanating from abroad. To rule IEEP itself is unconstitutional would be a breathtaking intervention by the Supreme Court, seizing power not only from the president but from Congress itself. Determining the scope of emergency action is something the American people must have a say about, which makes this a matter for the elected branches of government. If voters don't like how presidents use emergency powers under IEEP, they can elect a Congress that will change the law. Two branches have to cooperate to give the president this power, and the people... Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here Continue reading Here.
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News Melania Trump Launches First-of-Its-Kind Foster Youth Accounts to Give Children Asset Ownership Changing Tide: Record-low 38% of Americans Support 'Gender Transitions' - Gallup Poll 4 States Offering Pride Month Alternatives That Celebrate Family PRO-LIFE WIN: Trump Admin Moves to Remedy Downfall of IVF Trump Says US Snuck 22 Oil Ships Past Iran in Covert Op, US Strikes Regime 2 Nights in a Row Report: Parents Remain Essential to Instilling Authentic Faith in Next Generation Who Is Counseling Our Children? Supreme Court Vacates Biden-Era Decision Outlawing Gas Stoves, Water Heaters California Election: Our Republic in the Balance Texas Teen Gets 35 Years in Fatal Track Meet Stabbing US Retaliates with Strikes on Iran after Regime Downs US Helicopter; Future of Ceasefire Uncertain 'I Still Have a Dream' – MLK Jr.'s Niece Rejects SPLC's Hate-Mongering in Powerhouse Testimony Michigan Town Bans Church From Holding Worship Services: Lawsuit Search the Articles Archives |
All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.
Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.
| Home | Store | Subscribe | Facebook | Article Archive |