|
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Up Next for Trump: Historic Supreme Court Ruling on Immunity"...So for example, something like Commander-in-Chief power, the power of appointment; those are presidential powers recognized and authorized by the Constitution. It is difficult for me to imagine that the president can be criminally charged simply for executing those kinds of powers." -Cedarville University political scientist Dr. Mark Caleb Smith
It is a crucial moment for the United States, especially since this case involves former President Donald Trump, who claims he acted in his official duties as president on January 6th and is immune from prosecution. "Regardless of what the court does here, the decision they are going to hand down is going to have a significant effect on executive power moving forward," explained Cedarville University political scientist Dr. Mark Caleb Smith. That's because of the possible impact on past presidents. The same could go for George W. Bush for his role in the Iraq war and execution of Saddam Hussein, and Bill Clinton for the bombing of a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant. The case before the court may come down to official acts as president and unofficial acts as a private citizen or presidential candidate. So, how do we decide, who decides what is official and what isn't? Smith said the clearest place to go to decide what is an official act, and what's not, would be the US Constitution itself. "Now, it's not going to be an exhaustive list, but when we're seeing the president execute powers listed there in Article Two," he said. "So for example, something like Commander-in-Chief power, the power of appointment; those are presidential powers recognized and authorized by the Constitution. It is difficult for me to imagine that the president can be criminally charged simply for executing those kinds of powers." Bradley Jacob, Associate Dean at Regent University Law School, said courts have already established a legal precedent on civil immunity for presidents. "You can't get damages from a president because of his decisions," he explained. "And I'm not sure that any of those other issues violated the criminal law because if you're in a military situation, the president has quite a bit of flexibility as commander-in-chief, and throughout the whole history of the world, presidents, kings, executive leaders have ordered military actions that have caused their people to die." Smith argues that the court is likely to rule that presidents are subject to the same criminal standards as military officers. "You have certain proper functions, you have the rules that are in place under the uniform code of military justice, once you step outside of those, well, then you can be held responsible," he explained. "I think the president is going to end up in a similar place." Most constitutional law scholars agree: that the court is likely to rule that presidents have immunity from prosecution only for their official acts as president. So, does that mean Donald Trump's criminal trials could be dismissed? Jacob said he doesn't believe any of them will go away. "Maybe a few of the allegations, a few of the indictments will be thrown out. But by and large, I think you're going to see continued movement towards the trials of President Trump, but probably not fast enough to reach any conclusions before the election," predicted Jacob. Regardless, this historic and unprecedented Supreme Court decision is expected to result in constitutional consequences not only for Donald Trump but for the future of the American presidency. Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here Mr. Lane currently serves as International News Director and Senior International Correspondent for CBN News.
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News America of 1976 Would Not Recognize Herself in Our 250th Year Baseball Players Refuse to Wear Pride Uniforms, Forced to Forfeit Canada: Carney Liberals Move to 'Force' Radical Internet Surveillance Bill through House Belfast Is Burning, and the Media Won't Say Why Israel, Hezbollah Agree to New Ceasefire after Conflict Delayed US-Iran Talks Report: Biden-Era FDA Spun Autopsy Results to Downplay COVID Vaccine Deaths in Kids, Letter Shows From Pulisic's 'Bible Time' to Team Prayer on the Field, US Gives 'Glory to God' at World Cup Good News: Gasoline Drops Below $4 A Gallon Pennsylvania Governor Shapiro Abandoning 30,000 Children as Democrats Push to Strip School Choice Canada's Parliament Officially Passes 'Bible Ban' Bill C-9 Occupied Britain: Muslim Rape Gang Report Warns against Dangers of Mass Immigration (Part 1) Obama Center Contractors Say Millions Are Owed VP Vance Defends Iran Deal, Says It Will Benefit Both America and Israel President Trump Signs MOU with Iran During Dinner at Palace of Versailles (VIDEO) [Watch] JD Vance Ventures Onto 'The View,' Serves Up an Unforgettable Schooling School District Pays $95K to Settle Lawsuit After Painting Over Bible Verse Tribute to Charlie Kirk Is MLB Treating Christians Differently? Senator Hawley Demands Answers Hundreds of Thousands of Antidepressants Recalled Over Potential Cancer Risk Search the Articles Archives |
All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.
Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.
| Home | Store | Subscribe | Facebook | Article Archive |