To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE


SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

US Supreme Court Will Hear Case Regarding Regulation of Abortion Pill

Cassy Fiano-Chesser : Dec 14, 2023  LiveAction News

In August, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that mifepristone can remain on the market in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. US Food and Drug Administration — but only under the conditions for use from 2016. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded the safety requirements (REMS) for mifepristone several times; in 2021, the FDA allowed for mail-order pharmacy distribution, enabling it to be shipped by mail, and eliminating the requirement for it to be dispensed in-person. In 2023, the FDA allowed the abortion pill to be sold at retail pharmacies.

[LiveAction News] The Supreme Court has announced that it will hear the case involving abortion pill restrictions this term — its first case involving abortion since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022. (Screengrab Image)

In August, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that mifepristone can remain on the market in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. US Food and Drug Administration — but only under the conditions for use from 2016. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded the safety requirements (REMS) for mifepristone several times; in 2021, the FDA allowed for mail-order pharmacy distribution, enabling it to be shipped by mail, and eliminating the requirement for it to be dispensed in-person. In 2023, the FDA allowed the abortion pill to be sold at retail pharmacies.

Though the court had called for the prior safety standards to be reinstated, the ruling did not have an immediate impact on the availability of mifepristone, due to a prior order from the Supreme Court that would stay in effect until the Court rules again on the issue or refuses to hear the case on appeal.

The FDA then requested the Supreme Court's intervention. Danco, the manufacturer of the abortion pill, also asked for the high court to weigh in.

Oral arguments will likely take place in the spring, with a decision expected to come in June. The justices said they would not consider a separate challenge to the FDA's initial approval of mifepristone in 2000, meaning whatever decision the Supreme Court makes, mifepristone will remain available. It's been estimated that since being approved, approximately 6 million preborn children have been killed.

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) released a statement in response to the news; ADF represented the plaintiffs in the original case. "The FDA harmed the health of women and undermined the rule of law by illegally removing every meaningful safeguard from the chemical abortion drug regimen, including doctor visits and dispensing the drug by mail. Like any federal agency, the FDA must rationally explain its decisions. But FDA failed to do so by bypassing scientific judgment and placing politics ahead of the well-being of women and girls," the statement read. "Every court so far has agreed that the FDA acted unlawfully by removing common-sense safeguards for women and authorizing dangerous mail-order abortions. We urge the Supreme Court to do the same."

Texas Right to Life also issued a press release via email, noting (emphasis added):

The Supreme Court will consolidate and hear two cases over the same subject matter sometime next year: F.D.A. v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine and Danco Laboratories v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine.

A favorable ruling from the US Supreme Court in this case could reduce abortions even in pro-abortion states by limiting the drug's use to earlier in pregnancy and requiring an in-person visit to a physician. These federal safeguards had been waived by pro-abortion presidential administrations. The court cannot change the status quo in Pro-Life states like Texas where the Right to Life of all preborn children is legally recognized.

The group also added, "This lawsuit does not ask the court to take mifepristone off the market for all purposes. Thus, the ruling can only apply to chemical abortions. While miscarriage treatment can indeed involve similar drugs and procedures as elective abortion, removing a deceased child who passed away by spontaneous miscarriage is legally and morally different than intentionally ending that child's life, and it is therefore not defined as an abortion." Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here







SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News

AMERICAN SOUNDTRACK: Singer-Songwriter Kaylin Roberson Honors Father and 250 Years of Brave Soldiers in Stirring Ballad 'So I Didn't Have To' (Video)

America of 1976 Would Not Recognize Herself in Our 250th Year

Baseball Players Refuse to Wear Pride Uniforms, Forced to Forfeit

Canada: Carney Liberals Move to 'Force' Radical Internet Surveillance Bill through House

Belfast Is Burning, and the Media Won't Say Why

Israel, Hezbollah Agree to New Ceasefire after Conflict Delayed US-Iran Talks

Report: Biden-Era FDA Spun Autopsy Results to Downplay COVID Vaccine Deaths in Kids, Letter Shows

Newly Exposed: Fauci Funded Wuhan Lab Research That Sparked COVID; Evidence Fauci Manipulated Intelligence and Lied to Congress

From Pulisic's 'Bible Time' to Team Prayer on the Field, US Gives 'Glory to God' at World Cup

Good News: Gasoline Drops Below $4 A Gallon

Pennsylvania Governor Shapiro Abandoning 30,000 Children as Democrats Push to Strip School Choice

Canada's Parliament Officially Passes 'Bible Ban' Bill C-9

Occupied Britain: Muslim Rape Gang Report Warns against Dangers of Mass Immigration (Part 1)

Obama Center Contractors Say Millions Are Owed

VP Vance Defends Iran Deal, Says It Will Benefit Both America and Israel

President Trump Signs MOU with Iran During Dinner at Palace of Versailles (VIDEO)

[Watch] JD Vance Ventures Onto 'The View,' Serves Up an Unforgettable Schooling

School District Pays $95K to Settle Lawsuit After Painting Over Bible Verse Tribute to Charlie Kirk

Is MLB Treating Christians Differently? Senator Hawley Demands Answers

Hundreds of Thousands of Antidepressants Recalled Over Potential Cancer Risk



Search the Articles Archives

Keyword:  
Author:  
Words Posted On:  
Day Month Year



Subscribe to
Breaking Christian News


Follow BCN on Twitter
Are You Praying for Our Government Leaders?
BCN Staff

Steve Shultz
Steve Shultz, Managing Editor
Founder and Owner


Aimee Herd
Aimee Herd, Editor


BCN Plus
Are You Praying for President Trump?
 
 

All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.


Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.

editor@breakingchristiannews.com