|
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Supreme Court Strikes Down Biden's Student Loan 'Forgiveness' Plan"The Supreme Court justices halted ...Biden's abuse of executive authority by holding that his plan to cancel student loan debt for 40 million borrowers was unlawful. They rightly found that this was an issue for Congress, not the administrative bureaucracy, to decide." -Jack Fitzhenry, a Heritage Foundation legal fellow, and Lindsey Burke, director of The Heritage Foundation's Center for Education Policy
The nation's highest court heard arguments in February in two cases: Biden v. Nebraska and Department of Education v. Brown. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion in Biden v. Nebraska, 6-3, striking down Biden's plan. The court unanimously denied standing in the Brown case. Biden announced plans last August to cancel $10,000 of debt for individual student loan borrowers who make less than $125,000 per year ($250,000 for households) and to forgive $20,000 of debt for borrowers who received a Pell Grant. Biden's Education Department relied on a post-9/11 law known as the HEROES Act of 2003 that grants the US secretary of education the authority to allow military troops to delay their student debt obligations during national emergencies. (HEROES is an acronym for the Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions.) Roberts ruled that "the HEROES Act provides no authorization for the Secretary's plan even when examined using the ordinary tools of statutory interpretation—let alone 'clear congressional authorization' for such a program." "The Supreme Court justices halted ...Biden's abuse of executive authority by holding that his plan to cancel student loan debt for 40 million borrowers was unlawful," Jack Fitzhenry, a Heritage Foundation legal fellow, and Lindsey Burke, director of The Heritage Foundation's Center for Education Policy, said in a statement Friday. "They rightly found that this was an issue for Congress, not the administrative bureaucracy, to decide." (The Daily Signal is The Heritage Foundation's news outlet.) "The astronomical cost to American taxpayers of this ill-conceived program was only surpassed by its unfairness—since it would have punished millions of Americans who dutifully paid off their student loans as well as those who never took out loans in the first place," Fitzhenry and Burke added. "If we want to help students deal with the increasing cost of getting a degree, giving a bailout to the very colleges and universities that hike prices is not the answer." "Breaking up the monopoly of college accreditors and offering students more higher education options, while simultaneously cutting off the open spigot of federal higher education subsidies, is a start," the Heritage experts added. "Ultimately, students should be equipped with the knowledge and certainty that the student loans they take out can be repaid in future employment." "In the [Biden v. Nebraska] case, several states argue that they have standing primarily because if Biden cancels student loan debts, state agencies that the federal government pays to service those loans will lose revenue because they are paid on a per-loan basis," GianCarlo Canaparo and Fitzhenry of The Heritage Foundation's Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies wrote in a commentary for The Daily Signal, adding: That loss of revenue, in turn, could diminish funds available for scholarships and other education programs meant to benefit citizens of those states. In response, US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the Biden administration, argued that those state entities are not really arms of the states that they serve, and thus, the states cannot sue on behalf of the agencies. Canaparo and Fitzhenry also wrote: In the [Department of Education v. Brown] case, two borrowers who did not qualify for debt cancellation argued that by creating this program in secret and pursuant to emergency powers, the administration denied them the procedural right to participate in the decision-making process. In response, Prelogar argued that the law did not require the government to involve anyone in this process. EJ Antoni, a research fellow for regional economics in Heritage's Center for Data Analysis, weighed in on the implications of canceling student loan debt, especially the cost. "The Biden administration's estimated cost for student loan 'forgiveness,' which is actually transference, is laughably low. More reliable estimates, including dynamic estimates which account for incentive effects and behavioral changes, have a price tag north of $1 trillion," Antoni told The Daily Signal in a written statement. "Not only is there an upfront cost to taxpayers of assuming current student loans, but there are future costs as well." "Debt transference incentivizes futures students to borrow more, in anticipation of future transference," Antoni added. "Additionally, people who wouldn't have borrowed at all will take out loans for the same reason. That will lead to tuition increases and higher costs of attendance, as has happened every time student loan programs were expanded and borrowing increased." Elaine Parker, president of the Job Creators Network Foundation, reacted to Friday's ruling. "JCNF's lawsuit played an integral role in today's victory. Our case, brought in Texas, blocked the entire program at the district level and stopped the application process, allowing the legal challenge to go to the Supreme Court," Parker said in a written statement. "We are all winners today now that this illegal program has been struck down. JCNF looks forward to driving the conversation around meaningful higher education reform to address the root cause of this crisis and make college affordable," Parker added. Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here This is a breaking story and may be updated. The Daily Signal's Virginia Allen and Fred Lucas contributed to this report. Samantha Aschieris is a senior news producer for The Daily Signal.
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News America of 1976 Would Not Recognize Herself in Our 250th Year Baseball Players Refuse to Wear Pride Uniforms, Forced to Forfeit Canada: Carney Liberals Move to 'Force' Radical Internet Surveillance Bill through House Belfast Is Burning, and the Media Won't Say Why Israel, Hezbollah Agree to New Ceasefire after Conflict Delayed US-Iran Talks Report: Biden-Era FDA Spun Autopsy Results to Downplay COVID Vaccine Deaths in Kids, Letter Shows From Pulisic's 'Bible Time' to Team Prayer on the Field, US Gives 'Glory to God' at World Cup Good News: Gasoline Drops Below $4 A Gallon Pennsylvania Governor Shapiro Abandoning 30,000 Children as Democrats Push to Strip School Choice Canada's Parliament Officially Passes 'Bible Ban' Bill C-9 Occupied Britain: Muslim Rape Gang Report Warns against Dangers of Mass Immigration (Part 1) Obama Center Contractors Say Millions Are Owed VP Vance Defends Iran Deal, Says It Will Benefit Both America and Israel President Trump Signs MOU with Iran During Dinner at Palace of Versailles (VIDEO) [Watch] JD Vance Ventures Onto 'The View,' Serves Up an Unforgettable Schooling School District Pays $95K to Settle Lawsuit After Painting Over Bible Verse Tribute to Charlie Kirk Is MLB Treating Christians Differently? Senator Hawley Demands Answers Hundreds of Thousands of Antidepressants Recalled Over Potential Cancer Risk Search the Articles Archives |
All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.
Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.
| Home | Store | Subscribe | Facebook | Article Archive |