|
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Supreme Court Hears Case Threatening Obamacare, But It's Unlikely the Justices Will Kill It"If the Supreme Court overturns Obamacare, Joe Biden and the Democrats insist that those with preexisting conditions would no longer have access to healthcare. Nothing could be further from the truth. There is a consensus in both parties that we need to protect those with preexisting conditions. We don't need Obamacare to achieve that worthy goal." -Alfredo Ortiz, Job Creators Network
California v. Texas is the case that got all the attention at Amy Coney Barrett's hearings as Democrat senators put up big posters of all sorts of sick people they say will lose their healthcare if Obamacare's wiped out through this case. Now they'll soon see if all that fear was justified. It's true that the Trump administration and a number of red states asked the Court to use this case to kill the entire Affordable Care Act. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins argued, "The (individual) mandate is best read as a command to purchase health insurance and that is unconstitutional. And the text of the law says that the remainder of the ACA cannot work without that individual mandate." But the other side—consisting of blue states and congressional supporters of the ACA—argued at first Congress thought Obamacare's individual mandate, or "stick" would be essential because the "carrots" offered wouldn't be enough to get people to buy health insurance. Lawmakers, however, have found the mandate isn't needed. Justice Samuel Alito made the same point for ACA backers, saying, "The individual mandate was like a part in an airplane that was essential to keep the plane flying. So if that part was taken out the plane would crash. But now, the part has been taken out and the plane has not crashed." ACA supporters say wiping the whole Act out would be disastrous. Verrilli added, "There's just no way Congress would have preferred an outcome that throws 23 million people off their insurance, ends protections for people with preexisting conditions, and creates chaos in the health care sector." What's most likely to happen is the justices will do what they often have before: practice severability. That is: sever what needs to go and let the rest of the Affordable Care Act survive. Hack the Mandate, Leave the Rest But it sounded like the justices were looking for a way to hack away what needs to go and leave the rest of Obamacare intact. That's what Prof. Josh Blackman at the South Texas College of Law heard. He stated, "The Court did not express even the slightest interest in setting aside the entire Affordable Care Act. I still think a majority of the Court may find that the mandate remains an unconstitutional requirement to buy insurance. But the Court will likely stop there." And Erin Hawley, a senior legal fellow at the Independent Women's Law Center, opined, "The oral argument today in California v. Texas highlighted that a solid majority of the Supreme Court believes in the Founders' vision of a limited federal government. The government may not force individuals to buy a product like health insurance under the Commerce Clause and Congress cannot zero out a tax and still claim to be operating under the taxing power. This means that the individual mandate is unconstitutional." But Alfredo Ortiz, president of the conservative-leaning Job Creators Network, is hoping the justices will kick the entire ACA to the curb. He stated, "Since Obamacare was signed into law, more than 30 percent of small business owners have dropped insurance coverage for employees due to rising premiums. Since 2013, premiums for the average individual plan have increased by 123 percent, while premiums for family plans have risen by 174 percent. Half of Americans now have access to two or fewer healthcare plans on Obamacare exchanges; nearly one in five have access to one. Ortiz continued, "If the Supreme Court overturns Obamacare, Joe Biden and the Democrats insist that those with preexisting conditions would no longer have access to healthcare. Nothing could be further from the truth. There is a consensus in both parties that we need to protect those with preexisting conditions. We don't need Obamacare to achieve that worthy goal." Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News July 4th Fireworks Will Be Great on America's 250th Birthday, But Your Dog Will Hate Them! Our Favorite Patriotic Tunes, Part 2: 3 Songs Swiped from the Brits (Videos) World Cup: Team USA Wins, Goes to the Sweet 16 Round against Belgium on Monday 3,000 Walk Boston's Freedom Trail: 'We Have A Lot to Thank God For' Christian Student Says She Was Forced to Make an Unthinkable Graduation Choice Famous TikTok Tarot Card Reader Finds Jesus, Deletes All Occult Content (Video) Muslims Massacre 22 More Christians in Nigeria, Including a Pastor Energy Secretary Issues Emergency Orders to Bolster Mid-Atlantic Power Grid Amid Heat Wave Risks Here's How Fauci Can Still Face Prosecution Despite His Pardon President Trump Announces GOP to Host First-Ever Midterm Convention in Dallas Tennessee Congressman Introduces Bill to Ban 'Birthright Tourism' 5 Taxpayer Wins from Vice President Vance's Fraud-Fighting Task Force 250 Reasons Why We Love America Stories of Heroism and Miracles from the Devastation in Venezuela, Shared on Social Media Enemies Within: The Threat of Communism to America Man Taken into Custody in Somalia for Role in Huge MN Fraud Scheme Search the Articles Archives |
All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.
Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.
| Home | Store | Subscribe | Facebook | Article Archive |