|
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Hawaii: A Major Federal Court Victory for Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers and Free SpeechThanks to the Supreme Court's decision in NIFLA, and the positive effects that decision is already having in the lower federal courts, state and local governments are now going to think twice about targeting pro-life pregnancy centers with burdensome speech requirements.
Thanks to more than half-a-century of Supreme Court decisions, the answer to that question is no. The Court has stated time and time again that "freedom of speech prohibits the government from telling people what they must say." Can the government force a pro-life pregnancy counseling center to advertise a state-run program that offers free or low-cost abortions? Thanks to the Supreme Court's recent decision in NIFLA v. Becerra, the answer to that question is also no. As explained in more detail here, the Supreme Court in NIFLA held that California's "Reproductive FACT Act" was preliminarily unconstitutional. That law, among other things, required licensed pregnancy centers to tell every one of their clients, no matter the reason for their visit, that California offers free or low-cost abortions for eligible women. Shortly after California passed the law that was eventually and preliminarily held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in NIFLA, Hawaii passed an almost identical law to California's. That law required "limited service pregnancy centers" to inform their clients, in any language of a client's choosing, that: Hawaii has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services, including, but not limited to, all FDA-approved methods of contraception and pregnancy-related services for eligible women. To apply online for medical insurance coverage that will cover the full range of family planning and prenatal care services, go to mybenefits.hawaii.gov. While "abortion" is not explicitly mentioned in the mandated notice (though earlier drafts of the law did), abortion is one of the covered "family planning services" to which Hawaii offers free or low-cost access. In other words, like California, Hawaii required pro-life centers to tout the availability of the very procedure which those pro-life centers were organized to counsel against. The day after the Hawaii law went into effect, we filed suit against the Hawaii Attorney General on behalf of Aloha Pregnancy Care and Counseling Center, a pro-life pregnancy center in Kaneohe. Aloha's mission "is to bring the love of Jesus, hope for the future and practical support to those experiencing unplanned pregnancies." Among other services, Aloha offers free pregnancy testing, ultrasounds and counseling about pregnancy options. Our lawsuit alleged that the law violated Aloha's constitutional rights, and we asked the court to enjoin the enforcement of the law pending a final decision on the merits of our constitutional claims. Before, however, the district court ruled on our motion for a preliminary injunction, the Supreme Court granted the certiorari petition in NIFLA v. Becerra. Rather than proceed any further in the case, the district court put a pause on our lawsuit until a decision by the Supreme Court. All we could do on behalf of Aloha was to wait and see how the Supreme Court would rule. In June, that waiting came to an end—and a happy one at that. Reaffirming the idea that the government has "no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter or its content," the Supreme Court held that California could not force pro-life pregnancy centers to act as a ventriloquist's dummy for a state-scripted, pro-abortion message. The Court held that the plaintiffs in that case were likely to succeed on the legal merits of their First Amendment challenge to the FACT Act. In light of NIFLA's holding and reasoning, it was impossible to see how Hawaii's copycat law could fare any better than California's. After the district court instructed the parties to decide how the case should proceed in light of NIFLA, the parties filed a joint stipulation with the court, agreeing that the law was unconstitutional as to our client and that state officials would not enforce that law against Aloha. Late last week, the district court entered an order effectively resolving the case once and for all. The court ordered: That Hawaii Revised Statutes § 321-561(b)-(c) is declared to be unconstitutional under the United States Constitution as-applied to Plaintiff with respect to Plaintiff's First Amendment Free Speech Claim. Defendants, their employees, agents, and successors in office, along with any person acting in concert with them, are permanently enjoined from enforcing Hawaii Revised Statutes § 321-561(b)-(c) as against Plaintiff. The court's permanent injunction and final judgment is not just welcome news for our client, Aloha, and the women it tirelessly serves, it's important news for pro-life pregnancy centers across the country. Thanks to the Supreme Court's decision in NIFLA, and the positive effects that decision is already having in the lower federal courts, state and local governments are now going to think twice about targeting pro-life pregnancy centers with burdensome speech requirements. Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here. For the original article, visit aclj.org.
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News 'We've Seen Incredible Revival': Nearly 70 Inmates Transformed by the Power of God 'You Could Hear the Sobs of a Widow': Inside Charlie Kirk's Murder Trial Must Watch: Rubio Goes Hard on the 'Unique Evil' of Far-Left Terrorism, Promises More to Come Iran Targets Us Allies' Civilian Infrastructure While US Strikes Around Strategic Port City Trump: China Accessed 220 Million US Voter Files, Deep State Hid Evidence Archaeologists Uncover Hidden 1,600-Year-Old Christian Church Buried for Centuries Canadian Wildfire Smoke Chokes Northern US as Flooding Slams Texas UC San Fran Chancellor Refuses to Say If Men Can Have Babies GOP Grills AG Nominee on Abortion Drug and Trump Admin Priorities 'It Doesn't Get Bigger': Trump Drops Hint on Today's Yuge Primetime Announcement Vice President Vance Takes Shots at Senate on Joe Rogan Episode for Delaying SAVE America Act House Passes SAVE America Act as Part of MUST-PASS National Security Bill; Now on to the Senate Skeptical Doctor Shocked After Blind Son's Miracle Healing, Husband's Near-Death Experience Louisiana Pastor Sues Library After Being Fired over Preferred Pronouns Trans Athletes Drop Challenge to New Hampshire Women's Sports Law 30,000 'Trojan Horses': Europe and Britain Face Muslim Domination and Escalating Threat of Civil War Consumer Prices See Steepest Monthly DECLINE in More Than Six Years in June Search the Articles Archives |
All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.
Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.
| Home | Store | Subscribe | Facebook | Article Archive |